(1) Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and Graphemes in Words

Template for 7.1A.docx

• Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word.

• Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each word.

• Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart

• Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each word.

• Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the phonemes in each word.

(2) Assignment 13.3A: Scripting a Mini-lesson & Making an Anchor Chart

Task 1) Choose one of the ELAR TEKS listed below. 

• Make inferences and use evidence to support understanding.

• Retell in ways that maintain meaning and logical order.

• Summarize texts in ways that maintain meaning and logical order.

Task 2) Use the template in Canvas to script a minilesson for that TEK you selected.

(Uploaded)

Task 3) Create an anchor chart to accompany the minilesson you scripted. 

(3) Performance Assessment 13.7: Assessing Foundational and Comprehension Skills

Instructions

Tips for responding to an STR Constructed Response Question:

• Read the question carefully before you begin to write your response.

• Use bullets to organize your response.

• Each bullet should address the tasks in the order they appear in the question.

• There is a suggested word count, but you are not limited to that word count.

• Your response should directly address each component in depth.

• The final version of your response should conform to the conventions of standard English.

• Your written response should be your original work, written in your own words, and not copied or paraphrased from some other work.

• You may use citations when appropriate for this homework help.

Assessment 2: What are the effects of spinal manipulation (HVLA) on adults with chronic low back pain?

Article 1: A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study – PubMed (nih.gov)

Article 2: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis – ScienceDirect

Question 1: did the review ask a clearly focussed question?

Yes, 

Question 2: did the authors look for the right type of work?

Question 3: do you think the important relevant studies were included?

Question 4: did the authors do enough to assess the quality of the included studies?

JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT STUDIES

This assignment help

Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks

Date: 12/10/2021

Article: A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study – PubMed (nih.gov)

Yes No Unclear N/A Justification

Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population?  

Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? 

Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 

Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? 

Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur?  

Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 

Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 

Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 

Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□

Comments: (whether you find the article any good)

JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT STUDIES

Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks

Date: 12/10/2021

Article: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis – ScienceDirect

Yes No Unclear N/A Justification

Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population?  

Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? 

Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 

Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? 

Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 

Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur?  

Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 

Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 

Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 

Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□

Comments: (whether you find the article any good)

Performance Assessment 5.5A: Analysis of a Phonological Screening Assessment

Juan is a first grader at Mesa Ridge Elementary. His teacher, Mr Walker, just completed a phonological screening assessment with the class. Review and analyze Juan’s assessment results to determine his strengths and weaknesses with phonological and phonemic awareness skills. In the answer box provided in Canvas, write a response of approximately 200–300 words. ***Be sure to use the course content when responding to the following: 

• Task 1) Identify the stage of phonological awareness Juan is currently in.

• Task 2) Identify one significant need that Juan demonstrates related to phonological or phonemic awareness. Cite specific evidence from the phonological screening assessment to support your analysis.

• Task 3) Select and describe one appropriate, effective instructional strategy or activity that would address the need you identified related to phonological or phonemic awareness.

• Task 4) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you described would be effective in addressing the needs you identified and in helping Juan achieve grade-level reading standards. 

5.1A: Analyzing Spelling Errors

• Ms. Davidson gave a spelling test to her first-grade class. Afterward, she identified the words that were most confusing for her students. Read the directions below to help Ms. Davidson complete an analysis of the spelling errors.

• Directions:

• Task 1) Download the Assignment 5.1 A: Analyzing Spelling Errors Template 

• Task 2) Compare each assigned spelling word to the student response. 

• Task 3) In Column 3, identify the phoneme confusion; which incorrect phoneme did the student choose? 

• Task 4) In Column 4, identify the type of error the student made (place of articulation, manner of articulation, or both).

• Task 5) In Column 5, explain why that error probably occurred. ***The first word in the spelling assessment has been completed for you as an example.

• Dasia is a Kindergarten student at Orchard Elementary. Her teacher, Ms. Lennon, is reviewing Dasia’s Nonsense Word Fluency assessment and a current writing sample from Dasia’s journal to track Dasia’s progress with the alphabetic principle. Review and analyze Dasia’s assessment results and writing sample to determine her strengths and weaknesses with the alphabetic principle.

Performance Assessment 6.3A: Analysis of Data on Alphabetic Principle

•  Dasia’s Assessment Data 1.docx or https://smashingessays.com/services/coursework-writing-service/ 

• In the answer box provided, write a response of approximately 300-500 words. ***Be sure to use the course content when responding to the following: 

• Task 1) Define and explain the differences between the following terms: phonological and phonemic awareness, alphabet knowledge, the alphabetic principle, and decoding. How does mastering the alphabetic principle support reading fluency? 

• Task 2) List and explain the skills that must be in place before Dasia is able to decode words.

• Task 3) Review Dasia’s Nonsense Word Fluency assessment and writing sample.

• Task 4) Identify one significant need that Dasia demonstrates related to the alphabetic principle. Cite specific evidence from the assessment to support your analysis.

• Task 5) Select and describe one appropriate, effective instructional strategy or activity that would address the need you identified related to the alphabetic principle.

• Task 6) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you described would be effective in addressing the needs you identified and in helping Dasia achieve grade-level reading standards https://anyessayhelp.com/services/ . 

Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and Graphemes in Words

Template for 7.1A.docx

• Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word.

• Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each word.

• Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart

• Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each word.

• Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the phonemes in each word.